.

.

Sunday, 30 April 2017

Statistical Analysis: No bald man has ever won the Premier League

Recently I did an investigation into nationalities of managers to win the Premier League, when looking at this insistence upon some to have English or British managers. Well actually, you're better off looking for a foreign manager with hair. Seems ludicrous, but it's true.


So remember; none of them are English, only one of them had played in the Premier League before (five games on loan), and only one of them had managed in the Premier League before (a decade earlier). And none of them are bald. There is some thinning on display, but that doesn't mean bald. If you want to win the league, first make sure you are one of the following clubs; Chelsea, Manchester United, Manchester City, Arsenal, as Blackburn and Leicester were one-off flukes. Then, when picking a manager, he absolutely must not be English. He cannot have played in the Premier League, and he should never have managed in the Premier League. And he absolutely must have hair.

Seems ridiculous, right? Having hair doesn't make you a good manager. It would be ludicrous for someone to insist their manager was not bald. Yet no one reacts when; Jamie Redknapp, Mark Lawrenson, Alan Hansen, Alan Shearer, Paul Merson, Phil Thompson, Craig Burley, Chris Waddle, Alan Green, all those TalkSport presenters, and every other media doughnut spouts the utter rubbish they do about football managers. "He has to be English!" No he doesn't. "He has to have played the game!" No he doesn't. "He has to have managed in England before!" No he doesn't. He doesn't even need to speak English. Try disagreeing with that, and you'll be shot down by venomous vitriol without any kind of backing or evidence. They're angry, and they don't even know what they're angry at half the time. Try telling them you want your team's manager to have hair and they will probably explode. Literally pop like a balloon. And yet there's more evidence to suggest hair is important than; Englishness, playing experience, knowledge of the league. Evidence has never really been necessary when we want to be angry through.

Just how far back does this conspiracy go? Going beyond the Premier League era we can see that:
Howard Wilkinson had hair at Leeds.
George Graham had hair at Arsenal.
Howard Kendall had hair at Everton.
Joe Fagan had hair at Liverpool.
Bob Paisley had hair at Liverpool.

That takes us all the way back to the 1980/1981 season, when Ron Saunders was in charge of Aston Villa as they won the old English First Division. Some of the other managers were thinning, but they did not have the done on display like Saunders did. With this year likely to be won by Antonio Conte or Mauricio Pochettino, that would mark thirty six consecutive titles since a bald man managed a side to win the top prize in English football.





What's the catch? What's really going on here? We know that baldness does not mean you are any less able to complete a task than having hair. Hair is never a requirement on a job description. Yet it seems to matter. This article from UK Business insider claims that baldness in men signals dominance. Just how true is that? Football is the most manliest of sports, played by manly men, in front of audiences of men making manly men grunting sounds. And to be a manager of manly men playing a manly sport competing in front of manly men making manly men noises, you have to be a pretty manly man yourself. Apparently shaving your head makes you look more manly and dominant, like Bruce Willis. In 2010 GQ did a Bald 100, showing the 100 most powerful bald men in America. This is a list that did not include Lex Luthor, Professor Xavier, and Darth Vader.

In this USA Today article, CEOs say that it's better to be bald than to be short. It seems like a silly double standard, in that one should not be judged for something they can't control, but that these things you can't control have a value. I suppose that's why we all have these beauty standards that people are supposed to adhere to, like at these Miss World and other ridiculous competitions, where all the competitors, despite being of different ethnicities, actually look the same. Round eyes, slanty eyes, dark skin, light skin, big nose, small does, none of that really matters. There's this idea of what they are supposed to look like, and then there are slight variations of it, depending on the ethnicity.


Are these eighteen different competitors, or is it just a couple of women with different haircuts?


This is what has happened. Without makeup, they look like different women. With makeup, they all look the same.

Six similar looking American women.

Four blonde contestants that have had plastic surgery.

Out of these Latinas, only Paraguay looks distinct from the others.
The women we marry look nothing like this. The daughters we raise look nothing like this. The women we encounter on the street look nothing like this. Just where exactly are they? It's only a small few, that match these preconceived notions of beauty, that are ever put forward. But they do not have a monopoly on beauty. Similarly, the managers to have won the Premier League look nothing how the pundits would have you believe they have to be. They are not English, to have played in England, and to have had much managerial experience in England. And like these pageants, it's the pundits that judge and spread the narrative. It's people with these ideas in their heads trying to tell us what is acceptable and what is not.

Beauty pageants are archaic and abhorrent. The outward "beauty" that conforms to a checklist tells us nothing about the worth or real beauty of a person. Likewise, adhering to the pundit's standard of Premier League managers tells us nothing about how successful they are likely to be. The difference in football is that there is a competition for points. These points are not set by adjudicators, but by your skill. What you actually achieve. How many goals you score. If it were down to TalkSport, Harry Redknapp would be the most successful manager in football history. In the real world, he's not won enough to be considered as such. The idea is laughable.

The Guardian has also demonstrated that there are successful bald CEOs, though I believe one or two of them may be thumbs with faces drawn on. Again, The Guardian notes that bald men are seen as more powerful and dominant. It seems that if you shave your hair you are seen as tough, if you have long hair you are seen as a little untrustworthy, and if you have thinning hair, you are just a wet lettuce, so you better shave it off anyway.

But I think this is slightly at odds with reality. CEOs these days are becoming more self-made, and are not so much being born into success. Therefore, they are earning it, and their appearance doesn't actually matter. Business are judged on clear lines of success and failure, and the numbers won't lie. If you're doing a bad job, you're out of a job, hair or not.

In politics, where it doesn't matter what you actually do, only how you come across, hair still reigns supreme. Steve Bannon, the most powerful man in the world, and his puppet Donald Trump, both have excellent hair. They are both awful, awful men, but that does not matter. They have hair and they make people (enough voters) feel like they are capable. Who is the last bald US President that you can remember?


With the US Presidents, it goes all the way up to Obama. I have included a picture of Bannon Trump. For us Brits, the picture finishes with Tony Blair. Since then, we have had Gordon Brown, Call Me Dave, and Theresa May. Unlike the Americans, we've had two women. And like with the football managers, it appears, certainly in recent decades, that hair actually matters to people.

According to the Belgravia Centre, 40% of men have noticeable hair loss by age thirty-five. By the time of their first league title, I'd say that only Ranieri had noticeable hair loss. The others were just grey. From the eight managers to have won the league, Ranieri makes up 12.5%. From the twenty-four seasons, Ranieri's one championship makes up 4.166% of Premier League titles. These men were all over forty, and often in their fifties and sixties when they were winning the Premier League titles. By age sixty, it should be 65% of men with noticeable hair loss. Football managers and politicians seem to be above the curve on this one.
The WORST manager Rovers have ever had.

Why is it that these successful managers are not bald? Guardiola is shaven, not bald. Apparently there's a huge difference. If he were to grow his hair, he would be definitely labelled bald, but as he made the decision and took it into his own hands, people don't look down on him for it

There are some incredibly telling statistics from the Belgravia Centre that I will now share with you. They teach us about people's perceptions, and how this shapes their actions.



  • Men are more likely to look into hair restoration surgery than women (20% v 12%).
  • There was a 12% increase in hair restoration procedures from 2006-2008 worldwide.
  • More women are seeking methods of non-surgical hair restoration, which is up by 31.8% from 2004-2008.
  • Women are much more likely to see their doctor about thinning hair first than men (53% v 26%).
  • Almost half (47%) of hair loss sufferers would spend their life savings to regain a full head of hair.
  • Roughly a third (30%) of hair loss sufferers would give up sex if it meant they got their hair back.
  • About three-quarters (77%) of adults would be concerned if they were in their twenties and just starting out in their career and experiencing hair loss.
  • Hair loss is the issue women feel would make them least attractive to men.
  • Nearly nine in ten (86%) of women would be concerned if their were in their thirties and started to lose their hair.
  • About three-quarters (76%) of women would be worried if they were recently divorced and had noticeable hair loss and started dating again, compared to 50% of men.
  • More than half (55%) of hair loss sufferers would be more inclined to consider having a hair transplant if celebrities or public figures were more open about hair restoration surgery, but men are more likely to be influenced than women (57% v 45%).
Some of these are quite strange. Humans have one basic need, which is survival. That is broken down into food and sex. We eat to stay alive, and reproduce to keep our species going. Overriding that is our sense of belonging. We are social beings that work in herds and tribes. The fact that 30% said they would give up sex if it meant they got their hair back tells you where these people are in their heads. Sex is supposed to be the motivating factor in what drives people, and yet 30% would rather have hair than sex. Many of you are probably thinking "What's the point in hair without sex?" Exactly. It's about the perception of it. As a bald man, people might think you are not getting sex. As a man with hair, people would assume that you are. It's these perceptions from other people that are supposedly more important to us than the reality.

One only has to glance on Instagram to see how this works.


The above video is how Instagram works, and why I stay well away from it. She doesn't care about the special moment between her and her boyfriend, she wants the likes and the comments. She wants her friends to feign jealousy, tell her how special she is, and make out like these so very lucky. Yes, I'm aware the video is a parody. Yet how often have you walked past a moron in the way, who is taking a duck face selfie?




Gyms these days are full of selfie takers. That tells you that they are not working for them. And the woman in that selfie stick picture looks absolutely ridiculous. We walk past people doing that at tourists sites all over the world. The hold that pose for about ten seconds while taking the perfect picture. No one ever makes that face naturally, which is the first cause for concern. They are either completely oblivious, or really don't care, about the disparaging looks they get from passers-by. When we squeeze past them and look at them like they are the world's biggest idiot, it doesn't matter, because it's not us that they are trying to impress. It's their followers they care about. The followers will like it, comment on it, and tell them how wonderful they are, yet ironically will know how stupid they would have looked taking such a photo, because they do it themselves, yet they all collude in the lie, where nobody ever speaks about it, and they all perpetuate the validation of each other with their likes and comments. Pathetic.

While I'm on a roll, here are some more photos that should be shown to the narcissistic youth of today.






Looking at this picture here, my own feed is full of them. So you've gone to Rome? That's incredibly interesting. I've never been and would love to go. I'd really like to look through your photos and see some of the things that you saw, but unfortunately there's a problem. You're in the way. Would you accept watching a movie like this? Of course not. This woman is probably around 50% of the photo. The Coliseum in the background is out of focus. That's what I want to see. Instead, I'm looking at arms and a face, with a background of patchy grass. And what about the face? Forced, smug smile. With the sunglasses, it creates a sense of superiority, and as most facial flaws are around the eyes, such big glasses obscure us from seeing them. And there's a one-way interaction with sunglasses, in that I can see you, but you can't see me. The camera, as ever, is held from above, so we can't see double-chins, have our focus towards the breasts, and can't see bellies. She could be really fat for all we know. The point of the picture is not that she wants us to see the Coliseum, but for us to know she was at the Coliseum, and that she's having a better time than we are. But look around the picture, and what can we ascertain? The weather doesn't look brilliant, there appears to be a bit of construction going on, and most importantly, she appears to be alone. The eyes hold the key to true emotions, and we can't see them right now.

Selfies are a form of ego masturbation. It appears this author did the same Google search for photos that I did.

Yes, I've gone off on one, like I do a lot. One more thing before I become full circle. Did you know that becoming self-obsessed and vain can actually be quite lucrative for the young, entrepreneurial attractive woman? Of course you did, as you must have heard of those wretched Kardashians. Many of you were probably unaware, and this is quite important, that there are many young women making a living off of posting selfies and gifs on Twitter and Instagram. Amazing. This isn't like the BabeStation girls that roll around naked late night on Sky, charging for telephone calls. These are women that literally take photos and short videos of themselves, post them to social media, and yet make money from it. And here's how;

  • You have to be attractive. At least an 8/10, but also quite athletic. Like a fitness model with makeup. Plenty of squats, as the bum is usually a selling point, with the cleavage.
  • Post plenty of photos of things like rolling around in bed, post-shower, and at various stages of workouts (but obviously not sweating, because that is disgusting). The workouts are usually squats or lunges to accentuate the bum, or hip thrusts, because it looks like dry humping.
  • Begin to post short videos, between ten and thirty seconds, performing a few reps of these exercises.
  • Perpetuate the videos and photos, making it look like you are living an interesting, and holistic life. Occasionally make reference to friends, vaguely, through group photos, and "great night" statuses.
  • The fitness videos will eventually be picked up by fitness accounts, that will share your video with their followers. Make sure you are wearing bright coloured, spotless, brand name trainers, that you have the tightest of yoga pants, that make your bum look incredibly hungry, and wear a sports bra, but not too restricting. People have seen hip thrusts, squats, and lunges since the dawn of time, but they don't often see a video of a large breasted, big bummed, fitness model doing them. Get that right, and it could lead to an influx of male followers. Many of whom will have a shirtless gym mirror selfie as their display picture.
  • As the number of followers increase, interact with one of two of them through soundbites. Nothing too deep that gives anything away.
  • Start to write statuses thanking your "fans." They're not followers anymore, they are fans. I don't have 700 Facebook friends, I have 700 fans on Facebook. Do the occasional shot that would be taken from the point of view of your chin, if it were looking down, so that your fans can see down through your cleavage, across your flat stomach, and see a little of the shadow under your yoga pants. Do this horizontal on your bed for the best effect.
  • Due to your large number of "fans" and other such accounts that like and share your content, some advertisers will begin to get in touch. They will begin paying you for promoting their products. You only drink this type of herbal tea, as it helps you detox. You take these supplements, which help you get such womanly abs. You wear these gym gloves, use this shampoo, have these yoga pants etc. You'll get free samples, of course.
  • If all is going well, and you are teasing your fans enough with the post workout shower selfies (people don't appreciate how important it is for our athletes and role models to promote not only good hygiene, but also effective recovery techniques following exercise) you will then be able to take your most audacious step. You have income from the ad revenue, and you're getting free samples, but that's not enough. You need to setup a wishlist on Amazon, and post revealing selfies, suggesting that your fans, if they want to show their appreciation, buy you gifts from your wishlist. 
I wish I was making this up. I'm not. This stuff, as ridiculous as it is, actually happens. There are plenty of vain, attractive women out there that are willing to do it, but there are legions of sad, desperate, pathetic men that will buy these women gifts. It's supply and demand. They wouldn't be taking the pictures if there weren't enough idiots to financially reward them.

What's this got to do with football managers not being bald? Let me refer you back to the Belgravia statistics. So much of it comes from a lack of confidence. Premier League managers are broadcast all around the world, all night and day. They have to regularly face up to thousands of fans. Every day they have to contend with the egos of fit, talented, ambitious young men. Could you do that if you were shy, self-conscious, or lacking in confidence? And what if you were one of those that would trade sex for hair? Maybe that's why they are so successful. These managers have kept their hair, yet have taken a vow of celibacy.

When looking to command a group of people, you need to be confident, and you need to look the part. A simple Google search shows countless conflicting articles that claim bald men to be more or less attractive than men with hair. The fact most men would choose to keep their hair, and go to extreme lengths, such as spending their life savings and abstaining from sex, shows it must be important to them. The celebrities used for comparison are Vin Diesel and The Rock with Gerard Butler and Brad Pitt. I'm not sure many would say that Vin Diesel and The Rock look attractive in the same way that GB and BP do. The people that are attracted to the bald guys are attracted to other parts of them, like their physique, and dominant personality. Ergo, they are viewed as more masculine, but that's not entirely due to their baldness. Why is Jason Statham seen as more masculine than say Norris Cole from Coronation Street? Personality, facial expressions, build, accent, posture etc.

Baldness does not mean you are bad at your job, but for some reason, people don't want to be bald. If it's just a natural part of life, why do so many fight it? One could throw the same shade at wrinkle cream, eyeliner, high heels, blusher, foundation etc. Because shaven is attractive and bald isn't, some men are now paying for tattoos on their skulls that give the impression of a shaven head. much like if you were to dot biro marks all over your head. Being bald doesn't actually make a difference, but it feels like it does, so therefore it does. Which is incredibly strange.

We're long overdue a bald manager winning the Premier League. Bald men are massively under represented in football. Just look at the amount of bald men in the crowd, compared to bald managers. There's a lot of bald assistants and head coaches, but very few of the current Premier League managers are bald, and the next in line to win it have full heads of hair; Conte, Pochettino, Klopp. And remember folks; when selecting a manager for your Premier League team, once you've made sure you're at one of the top clubs, make sure he's not English, has not played in the Premier League, has not managed in the Premier League, and that he has hair.

Certainly don't let it be a woman.

And definitely not Brendan Rodgers.

Research Proposal: Is the perceived lack of opportunities to coach at home forcing young British based soccer coaches to be enticed by opportunities to coach abroad?






Is the perceived lack of opportunities to coach at home forcing young British based soccer coaches to be enticed by opportunities to coach abroad?
William Wilson
ww655614
Ohio University










Table of contents
Abstract                                                                                  3
Chapter 1: Purpose of the study                                             4
            Introduction                                                                4
            Theoretical Perspective                                               5
            Research Question                                                      7
Chapter 2: Literature Review                                                 8
            Opportunities at Home                                               10
            Opportunities Abroad                                                 12
Chapter 3: Methodology                                                         14       
            Research design                                                          14
            Sampling                                                                     14
            Organisations                                                              15
            Instrumentation                                                           16
            Data Collection                                                           16
            Limitations                                                                  17
Questionnaire                                                                          19
References                                                                              22


Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine if the perceived lack of opportunities to coach at home is forcing young British based soccer coaches to be enticed by opportunities to coach abroad.  The research will focus on young British based soccer coaches, below the ages of thirty-five, including those which have, and may still be, coaching overseas.  The groups to be examined through a survey design include British coaches still within the British Isles, and British coaches that have moved elsewhere in the world. Analysing the responses from participants concerning opportunities to coach at home, and the attractiveness of coaching abroad, it can be determined how much of an influence that a lack of opportunities in the UK plays a part in persuading coaches to migrate. There exist perhaps many reasons for migrating to work within the business of soccer, including; opportunity for full-time work, to learn and experience a new culture, to gain experience exclusive to a particular country or role, to further a career, to earn a higher salary, and to help the sport grow. Thousands of young British coaches gain their licenses every year, and compete with many others for the same positions. Countries overseas seem to hold in high esteem the English qualifications, and so import thousands of coaches each year, in both permanent and temporary roles.
Keywords:  soccer, football, coaches, coaching abroad, United Kingdom, British Isles, motivation, travel, commitment, migration
  

Chapter One: Purpose of the Study
            The purpose of conducting research into the area of coach migration could possibly shed some light on many things regarding the success and development of elite players and coaches within the British Isles. Compared to other top nations of Germany, Italy, France, and Spain, England, the larger and most successful British nation, is faring much worse. England is not producing top class talented players with the same depth and frequency as the other nations, nor are English soccer coaches winning major honours. This has a detrimental effect on the success of the English national team, that has a long history of underperforming at major tournaments.
            Within the United Kingdom, soccer is hugely popular. Residents get to enjoy some of the best foreign talent competing within the Premier League, and have access to many different types of soccer activities. Many people with a passion for the game will take to coaching. The current trend is that more and more coaches are becoming frustrated at a lack of coaching opportunities, and are often seeking these opportunities in other countries. Could it be that the talent pool of British coaches is being weakened by such migrations? Is it indicative of a glass ceiling that is halting the progression of talent?
            It is important to ascertain the main motivational factors that can draw coaches to work abroad, as doing so will shed some light on why Britain is losing hundreds and thousands of coaches every single year, which could potentially benefit international competitors. It must also be determined the opinions that coaches hold of the opportunities to work at home, as it may be more of a swaying factor than the enticement of moving abroad.
Introduction
The topic to be tested within this study is that of migration of British coaches. There is an increasing number of Britons that are choosing to migrate overseas to embark on coaching opportunities. As the Football Association looks to improve soccer at all levels, coaching is a huge part of their reform. It would be in their best interests to know if many of the best and brightest of the future generation of coaches will still be around to help be part of this revolution. Despite having one of the most popular and successful leagues, England has only one major honour at senior international level; the World Cup of 1966. The other three home nations of Wales, Scotland, and Northern Ireland regularly fail to qualify for major tournaments. With their accumulative population, the three nations are still just a fraction of the population of England, and their teams and leagues are not global brands like those found in England.
Opportunities for British coaches appear to be limited, yet a backlog is being created on this conveyor belt of coach education. It is a highly competitive industry, with not enough positions available to cater to the demand. That is why many will either seek such opportunities abroad, or find alternative career paths.
Theoretical Perspective
To ascertain the feeling towards staying or moving, the responses from coaches will be scrutinised along two main dependent variables; do you feel there are enough opportunities to make a living from coaching in the United Kingdom, and is that the biggest factor in deciding to work abroad or stay at home? 


To conduct such research, it will be necessary to reach a large group of coaches, both within the UK, and those who have migrated, and ask them for their opinions and feelings in regards to opportunities at home and opportunities abroad. It would also be important to delve deeper into these motivations, and identify what other factors play a role in the search for coaching opportunities, such as; education level, salary, desire to travel, experience, wanting to learn more about soccer in foreign countries, wanting to learn new languages, and ascertain the prominence of each, in addition to other potential motivations. Are these the main reasons for leaving the UK, or are they added bonuses? Do the coaches feel as if they have to leave to be able to further their career? Does the lifestyle of the USA or Middle East appeal to coaches, and soccer just gives them the avenue into the industry?
These results will be scrutinised, and some participants may be asked follow up questions in the form of an interview so that further clarification and detail can be gained, adding yet more depth to their responses. Employment history, experience, and coaching education levels will be compared between coaches who have or desire to work abroad, and those who have no desire to work abroad, as well as their current education or career level, referring back to the earlier question, but more in depth, and with far less bias.
The research will be compounded with literature that sheds light on many of the issues discussed within this study. Subjects that will be explored include reasons for migration, job satisfaction, and how opportunities can affect both. Why is there a distinct lack of opportunities at home? And why are so many foreign nations seemingly desperate to import British coaches? How has such a situation that leads to soccer coach migration been created?
Research Question
The variables that are relevant to this hypothesis both concern opportunities to coach; at home and abroad. Due to the large amount of time, money, and effort required to obtain licenses, it is not inconceivable to believe that one should be aptly rewarded for their dedication. Many coaches will hold ambitions of progression within their career, and as such, will wish to be able to make a living from coaching. The United Kingdom is “soccer crazy”, and the country is able to sustain around one hundred and fifty professional clubs, including some of the largest in the world. The level of competitiveness is high, much like the level of dedication required to obtain the licenses necessary to coach. If coaches cannot obtain work within their homeland, then expect to see many attempting to forge a career in another country. Sometimes to gain experience, sometimes to make a permanent move, but most frequently as some type of career progression. Most British coaches will likely be open to the idea of coaching abroad, and for many it will be as a direct result of the opportunities that are available. This is perhaps the perception that a lot of coaches have which would explain their need to migrate.


Chapter Two: Literature Review
The adage of the British Coaches Abroad website is that “You’re never too far from a British coach” also claiming that “The UK is generally not an option for many of us.” There are some huge organisations that operate within North America that make it their business to recruit coaches from the British Isles and place them within clubs across the Atlantic. YES Soccer, based in Illinois, asked @CoachingFamily, a Twitter account devoted to soccer coaching knowledge and expertise and over forty six thousand followers to assist in a poll, and the results read like this:
Would you rather: Coach part-time in an English Premier League academy, or full-time in a youth club stateside? Conducted on the 6th of September, 2016, the respondents totalled to 333, and overwhelmingly chose the latter option of coaching in the USA at 61%. One could easily discern between “part-time” and “full-time” in the two options, but this is indicative of the opportunities that are available. The general consensus is that in order to make a living from coaching soccer in the United Kingdom, a coach has to progress very high up the ladder, and such positions are scarce, and therefore highly sought after. The amount of hours, training, and money spent on improving as a coach, to many, can only be justified by a full-time wage or career, often only to be found overseas.
As determined by the work of Borges, Rosado, Oliveira, & Freitas (2014), the coaches from their study were moving abroad to make a professional career for themselves, to seek cultural challenges in foreign countries, and to develop the sport in a country abroad. The main driving factor was the professional career. From their work, coaches working abroad can fall into one of three categories; ambitionist, cosmopolitan, pioneer.
The ambitionist seeks to achieve the highest level possible in their career. A move abroad can sometimes be a stepping stone to a better job, or a gateway to new experiences and opportunities. In playing terms, the best players wish to move to the top European clubs to compete with and against the best in the world. For coaches, the opportunity to develop as a coach, or reach roles that are more challenging and bring more responsibility, may be found abroad. Many countries do not have a soccer education infrastructure, and as such, a lack of talent exists, with migrant coaches filling the void.
The cosmopolitan coach possesses motivations to migrate that can be as much about exploring culture as they can be about furthering a career. If a platform exists that enables a coach to learn more about their sport, yet at the same time learn new languages and become more culturally diverse, this will open up and enhance their career prospects in global sports that can often have multi-national teams.
The pioneer moves to grow the sport in a nation that is either unsuccessful, or a location where the sport is unpopular. Within soccer, it was mainly the British that first took to bringing the game to new shores, originally spreading the game through infrastructure and export of British workers, before establishing professional clubs that sought top coaches. As written by Taylor (2010, p. 144) “Mason has commented that British coaches ‘were to be found everywhere, from Spain to Hungary, to Italy and Uruguay’.” Between the World Wars, British coaches migrated to Spain, France, Switzerland, Germany, and the Netherlands. During that time, Austria and Hungary became two of the most revered countries in world soccer, and so they replaced the flow of British coaches in Europe.
Following the Second World War, British coaches began migrating to Scandinavia, and then to other English speaking countries, such as the USA, South Africa, and Australia. At that time, the other English speaking nations were not established giants of the game, yet due to a common culture, could have seemed more appealing to the migrating British coaches. By the 1970s, British coaches were being imported to the Middle East, with some of the Gulf Nations looking to be taken more seriously on the world sporting stage.
Opportunities at Home
At the current time of writing, within the English Premier League, the top coaching positions are predominantly taken by foreign coaches. Out of twenty clubs, only four have English managers, with one Scottish and two Welsh. As Gary Stevens (2016), former professional player and now exiled British coach, and many others can attest to “Working abroad wasn’t something that I planned. But the fact is, it’s very hard to get jobs in England.”
A problem faced by many young coaches is the cost of the licensing. The cost to gain the UEFA A License with the English FA is £2,965, compared to around £750 for the same qualification in Germany (Foster, 2016). The irony is that until coaches can operate at A License level, they will be most likely working part-time, and yet without the A License, it is very difficult to; a}. earn the money required to apply for the course, b}. be accepted on the course due to lack of top level experience.
There are five levels of coaching qualification within English soccer; Level 1, Level 2, and then come the elite levels of UEFA B and UEFA A, followed by UEFA Pro. To get to the A License, coaches will have had to have invested over £4,000 of their own money to obtain the necessary licenses, before taking the Pro License, which is worth over £8,000 (Foster, 2016). Those sums of money are hard to front for coaches that have made their own way up through grassroots and youth soccer, clearly favouring the riches of the ex-professionals that could easily afford such expensive courses. It is the fees, not the challenge of obtaining the licenses, that are turning many coaches off from the prospect of furthering their careers (Lomas, 2013).
At the top level of English football, the game is a global brand. Just as the world’s best players are imported, so are the world’s best coaches. From this point of view, it makes sense that there would not be many Britons in important coaching positions, as they are competing against a global talent pool. What provides cause for concern is that only one English coach has won any kind of top European honour in recent history, which was Steve McClaren’s FC Twente side winning the Dutch league in 2010 (BBC, 2010). McClaren obviously had to go abroad to win this title. Scottish managers have had much success in England, with Kenny Dalglish and Sir Alex Ferguson winning a plethora of titles, but they are long retired, and there is no apparent generation of successful Scottish coaches about to take their place. Even the most recent longstanding England national team coach, Roy Hodgson, made a name for himself abroad, coaching in Italy and Switzerland, following a hugely successful spell in Sweden (Phillips, 2016).
Two factors are apparent in influencing coaches to not take jobs in the UK; the cost of the licensing, and the preference for foreign coaches. The preference for foreign coaches is due to their comparative quality. There are many commentators, when discussing the state of English soccer, believe some ex-professionals are not keen to take jobs that they view as beneath them, such as working in the lower leagues. Instead, they wait for the opportunity to become available at reputable club in the Premier League, and then inevitably fail due to their lack of coaching ability (Magowan, 2010). Many of those that coach within English professional football never do so again after their first job (Whitehouse, 2016).
The opportunities do exist for ex-professionals to work in academies, but this is part-time work that will not be able to match the salary of their playing days, and so many pass on such opportunities (Moxley, 2016). For coaches from a non-professional background, academies are viewed as the hallowed ground, but by the time these coaches are experienced and knowledgeable to coach within academies, they will be at a stage of their lives that would require something more substantial than part-time work.
Opportunities Abroad
Challenger Sports, a US based soccer coaching company, claim to send over one thousand coaches from the UK to the USA and Canada every year (Challenger Sports, 2016). Many of these coaches are new, starting out their careers, and are seeking valuable experience. Some migrate for the experience of another culture, one that is similar to their own. Encapsulated in this is that soccer is still growing in the United States, and the migration of coaches can represent the pioneer spirit. It requires a more ability to make it as a coach in the US than it ever has done, but with lack of opportunities at home for both experienced and inexperienced coaches, it provides an easy transition to work in a developing soccer nation, that has a similar culture and a shared language, and can provide realistic, long term employment in the game.
Even as a UEFA A coach, it can be difficult to obtain a full-time wage working within coaching in England. Conversely, coaching abroad usually requires only a Level 2, and sometimes even a Level 1. Over 200 applicants sent their résumés in to third division MK Dons following the dismissal of coach Karl Robinson (Ward, 2016), highlighting the fierce competitiveness on behalf of the potential coaches. In the United States alone, many large soccer organisations are competing to recruit from a pool of British coaches, demonstrating a complete reversal in the balance of power between prospective employee and prospective employer.
To work for Arsenal Soccer Schools in Saudi Arabia, a coach would need to have a B License. The position would provide a tax free salary of £2,800 per month, with a free apartment, including all bills paid for, and a company car (FA Licensed Coaches Club, 2016). By comparison, an academy job in England would require a B License, sometimes an A License, and depending upon the team, would pay an hourly rate of between £15-£30 per hour, offering between four and ten hours per week (Careers In Sport, 2016). Short term jobs in the United States will offer $170-230 per week, for between twenty to thirty hours per week, staying with host families, and being treated like royalty (Careers In Sport, 2016), with zero bills to pay, while travelling around a number of states. The short term contracts are for summer camp work, and are very popular for students. For those wishing to stay long term, seasonal nine month contracts can be obtained, paying above $280 per week, with free accommodation or host family stay, and a car. Nine month contracts very quickly lead to residency status, and promotion within the company, working towards citizenship.
China is very quickly beginning to rival the riches available in Middle Eastern countries. The Chinese Super League is investing heavily in foreign players, and are beginning to import coaches to match the quality and growth of the league, while the Middle Eastern countries, particularly Qatar, where the Aspire Academy is aiming to be the best youth academy on the planet by 2020 (Aspire Academy, 2016), and are hoping to improve their stature within the global game in time for the 2022 World Cup. Due to the growth, much like has happened within English soccer when the Premier League expanded quicker than the talent pool available to it, these countries are doing all they can to incentivise the movement of talented foreign coaches.


Chapter Three: Methodology
The data that requires collection concerns two factors; the perceived lack of coaching opportunities within the British Isles, and how appealing the possibilities are of coaching abroad. Within this, it would be ascertained if British based coaches feel that they struggle to make a living from coaching soccer, and if they believe that they are unable to find worthwhile and challenging positions. It must be discovered how deeply the coaches have considered moving abroad, or if they have already travelled, what motivated them to do so?
For the coaches that have opted against the prospect of working abroad, it is paramount to determine what has influenced that decision; personal preference or depth of opportunities at home, and how much they know about the opportunities available and the benefits associated with moving to another country.
Research Design
To achieve this research study, a time limited investigation will be undertaken. The research method is quantitative as it provides a structure in order to analyse data, collective objective data to measure reality.
The research study will use online questionnaires for the collation of data. The questions will be closed ended. The advantages of this is that respondents can answer them in their own time and the responses should be easier to analyse and look for trends. The questionnaire will require for the participant to enter their age and their highest attained coaching qualification.
Sampling / Population
In order to determine if young British soccer coaches are being enticed to go abroad with the aim of seeking opportunities for employment, questionnaires and interviews will be conducted with British based coaches between the ages of twenty to thirty-five to determine why they are, or why they may wish to pursue opportunities abroad. With the English Football Association making it a primary target to raise the coaching standards up and down the country, still it can be found that thousands of coaches are leaving both permanently and temporarily each year, seeking opportunities and experiences abroad. Asking the coaches within this age bracket directly what their motivations and justifications are, would make it possible to identify and determine the key factors that influence these young soccer coaches.
Coaches of any nationality may answer, providing they have spent at least two years coaching within the British Isles. The United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland are two very closely linked nations that have a wealth of talented foreign coaches that have assimilated within the culture, that also look to travel via British links to coach abroad.
The age of coaches will be limited to thirty-five and under. As coaches become older and more experienced, it is likely that they will gain families, properties, and other responsibilities that will provide too many variables for consideration. A twenty-one-year-old coach may decide to not travel as the prospect of independence within a new culture may pose too daunting, whereas perhaps a forty-year-old coach may not choose to travel due to not wishing to uproot the spouse and children. Younger coaches are less likely to have such restraining commitments, meaning that their decisions will be based more upon comparing options at home to options overseas.
Organisations
British coaches, both at home and abroad, under the age of thirty-five, will be solicited to answer an online questionnaire. These coaches will be reached via a network of contacts within the game at clubs, leagues, and the FA Licensed Coaches Club. To reach this network, links to the online questionnaire will be posted via Facebook, LinkedIn, and Twitter, as well as being submitted to Hampshire FA and other county associations for local distribution. It is anticipated that more than three hundred coaches will respond. Coaching groups on Facebook such as Keep It On The Deck, Football Coaching Drills, and The Coaching Manual, Grassroots Coaching, in addition to the Twitter handles of @UEFABSupport, @UKCoachingBible, @CoachingFamily, and the LinkedIn groups of Football Coaches Network, Professional Football and Soccer Coaching, Jobs and Careers in Football, Grassroots Football Coaches.
Instrumentation
This is a quantitative research study, but if necessary as previously stated the researcher may   follow up on some of the questionnaires by interviewing participants. The online survey tool, Survey Monkey will be used. A sample of the questionnaire, which can be found in appendix, will be tested on 5 people to ensure that the questions are understood. Participants will be asked to respond within a two-week time frame.
Data Collection
The data collected from the online survey will be analysed, each individual response will be reviewed and matched with others to ascertain if there are any obvious trends in the responses which would enable the researcher to see any common themes or any outlying responses. Numerical data will be presented in graph format with additional commentary where appropriate.
The questions within the questionnaire will consist of a mixture of closed questions and multiple-choice questions, with the option to express further opinions. Firstly, it will be necessary to establish the age of the respondent, in addition to their highest coaching qualification. The questionnaire will then begin to investigate the motivations and experiences of the respondent, discovering whether they have coached abroad, and whether they intend to or not.
Using a Likert-scale, the coaches will be asked their opinions in regards to the perceived lack of opportunities in the UK, to determine how much the respondents agree with such a perception. Questions 7 and 8 will only be available to some respondents, depending upon whether they have coached abroad or not. These questions will provide the respondent with many answers to select, being able to select as many as applicable, in order to express their motivations in regards to coaching abroad or staying in the UK. Both questions will provide an ‘other’ option for coaches to explain any other factors that have not been listed within the question.
Another multiple-choice question will be available to all respondents to answer which factors they feel could be influencing coaches to seek employment abroad, as well as an ‘other’ for further factors not included. The final question, again using a Likert-scale asks if the participant would still seek employment abroad if they were doing well in the UK. It is believed that the answers to these questions will help to identify the main pushes and pulls towards coaches when considering coaching overseas.
Limitations
Ethically, this study must do all possible to prevent the results from being tainted by confirmation bias. Due to the nature of the research, and the presumption of the sentiment that coaching abroad is what good coaches are supposed to do, it is important to shape and word questions in a way that does not nudge the participant towards one particular line of thought. If young British coaches hold no ambitions of working abroad, they must feel comfortable to explain their feelings. A way to avoid this can be to have them state their ambitions very early on, in addition to using open ended questions that are not leading in any way. The agreed University ethical process will be followed. All participants will be provided a consent form online before taking part in the survey. The consent would include a brief description of the study, its purpose and what will happen with the findings of the study. No names or addresses will be recorded or shared.
The term ‘British based’ may be a little confusing and perhaps too broad. Foreign coaches that have been educated and experienced within the British coaching education should not be discounted from the results as they would be products of the British coach education system, and thus their experiences and opinions would be relevant. As it is a survey regarding coaching abroad, perhaps some respondents from abroad will misinterpret the meaning and believe that the questioning can apply to them, and as such will answer them from the perspective of a coach that has not experienced the British coaching industry. There are also no parameters in place to prevent coaches outside of the age bracket from responding, and entire faith is placed upon the reliability of the honesty of respondents.
Questionnaire
11.  What is your age?
18 – 19 – 20 – 21 – 22 – 23 – 24 – 25 – 26 – 27 – 28 – 29 – 30 – 31 – 32 – 33 – 34 - 35
22.  State your Highest coaching qualification:
Level 1 – Level 2 – UEFA B – UEFA A – UEFA Pro
33.  Do you currently or have you ever coached outside of the UK?
Yes - No
44.  Would you consider coaching outside of the UK? Or again? Or permanently?
- Never have, and would not consider coaching abroad.
- Never have, and would consider coaching abroad.
- Already have, and would not consider coaching abroad again.
- Already have, and would consider coaching abroad.
- Currently coaching abroad, and will return permanently to the UK in the future.
- Currently coaching abroad, and would like to remain coaching abroad.
55.  Do you view your long term coaching future in the UK or abroad?
UK – Abroad
66.  How much do you agree with the statement “There is a lack of opportunities for coaches to work within soccer in the UK?”
Strongly Disagree – 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – Strongly Agree
77.  (Only for coaches that have coached abroad) Which of the following do you prioritise when considering the possibilities of coaching abroad? Select all that apply:
- Earning potential.
- Possibility to gain experience and improve as a coach.
- Possibility to work with better teams and players.
- Career prospects and progressions.
- To experience other cultures.
- To learn other languages.
- To learn about soccer from another world view point.
- Attractive wage packet plus amenities.
- To travel and explore the planet.
- To permanently settle in another country.
- To expand and grow the sport in an under developed soccer nation.
- To experience a better climate or location.
- Other. Please specify _________
88.  (Only for those that have not coached abroad) Which of the following apply to your decision thus far to not coach abroad? Select all that apply.
- I have a good position with a club in the UK.
- Soccer in other countries is typically inferior to the UK, and I want to be amongst the best.
- I do not wish to live in a country with different customs or a different language.
- I would miss British food.
- I would miss my friends and family too much to leave.
- I have too many responsibilities; partner, business, property, dependents etc.
- I do not have the money to afford the initial flight or visa costs.
- I have not yet found the right opportunity, or an opportunity that I find appealing.
- I would be fearful of migrating to certain countries due to crime and violence.
- Other. Please specify _________
99.     Which factors do you believe influence British based coaches to seek coaching employment overseas? Select all that apply.
- Lack of earning potential.
- Lower standard of facilities.
- The cost of gaining licenses in order to progress up the coaching ladder.
- Lack of respect displayed towards volunteer and paid coaches by parents and players.
- The difficulty of having to balance part-time work and other commitments with coaching.
- The British weather.
- The difficulty of earning a full-time wage from coaching
- The fierce competition for the available roles.
- Lack of professionalism within grassroots.
- Lack of support and guidance from the governing bodies.
- The perceived glass ceiling that can prevent non ex-professionals from gaining highly rated jobs.
- Other. Please specify _________
110.  How much do you agree with the statement “If I had a decent full-time coaching job in the UK, I would never have considered moving abroad to coach”
Strongly Disagree – 1 – 2 – 3 – 4 – 5 – 6 – 7 – Strongly Agree


References
Almurshed, H. (2016, July 15). Arsenal Soccer Skill Lead Coach. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://facc.thefa.com/jobs/arsenal-soccer-skill-lead-coach
Amos, O. (2016). Far-Flung Adventures: Introducing British Coaches Abroad With Gary Stevens. Retrieved September 24, 2016, from http://thesetpieces.com/interviews/far-flung-adventures-introducing-british-coaches-abroad-gary-stevens/

Borges, M., Rosado, A., Oliveira, R. D., & Freitas, F. (2014). Coaches’ migration: A qualitative analysis of recruitment, motivations and experiences. Leisure Studies, 34(5), 588-602

Damien Comolli blames FA coaching for England's lack of success. (2013, September 08). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.skysports.com/football/news/12016/8912015/damien-comolli-blames-fa-coaching-for-englands-lack-of-success

Football Academy Coach. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.careers-in-sport.co.uk/jobs/view/1986

Foster, R. (2016, September 7). If English football is short of coaches, why are badges cheaper in Germany? Retrieved October 18, 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/football/the-agony-and-the-ecstasy/2016/sep/07/england-grassroots-football-iceland-germany-coaching

Huckleberry, S. D. (2011). Commitment to coaching: Using the sport commitment model as a theoretical framework with soccer coaches (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ohio University.

James, S. (2014, March 28). The FA's UEFA Pro License course - who, what and when. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/football/2014/mar/28/fa-uefa-pro-licence-course

Lomas, M. (2013, October 7). Counting the cost of coaching. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.espnfc.co.uk/story/1572894/mark-lomas-counting-the-cost-of-coaching

Magowan, A. (2010, July 7). The real state of English coaching. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/8785895.stm

Moxley, N. (2016, January 16). The Premier League must do something about the lack of English managers in the top flight. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/news/premier-league-must-something-lack-7156056

Phillips, T. (2016, March 8). 9 Brits who managed abroad: Reid’s bus-pushing, Roy’s tour and brilliant Sir Bobby. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.fourfourtwo.com/features/9-brits-who-managed-abroad-reids-bus-pushing-roys-tour-and-brilliant-sir-bobby

Recruitment Home. (n.d.). Retrieved September 25, 2016, from htto://www.challengersports.com/cr_home.aspx

Scott, M. (2010, June 1). Football coach shortage paints bleak picture for England's future. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/football/2010/jun/01/football-coach-shortage-england

Soccer Camp Coach. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.careers-in-sport.co.uk/profile/soccer-camp-coach

Stephenson, B., & Jowett, S. (2009, January). Factors that influence the development of English youth soccer coaches. International Journal of Coaching Science, 3(1), 3-16
Steve McClaren's Twente win Dutch league title. (2010, May 02). Retrieved October 28, 2016, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport2/hi/football/europe/8657029.stm

Taylor, M. (2010). Football's Engineers? British Football Coaches, Migration and Intercultural Transfer, c .1910– c .1950s. Sport in History, 30(1), 138-163.

The FA UEFA Pro License. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.thefa.com/get-involved/coach/courses-and-pathway/fa-national-courses/the-fa-uefa-pro-licence

Vision. (n.d.). Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://www.aspire.qa/aboutMissionVision.aspx

Ward, A. (2016, October 25). MK Dons Chairman reveals more than 200 people have already applied for manager's job. Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.itv.com/news/anglia/2016-10-25/mk-dons-chairman-reveals-more-than-200-people-have-already-applied-for-managers-job/

Whitehouse, M. (2016, October 3). The Issue with Coaching in English Football. Retrieved October 18, 2016, from http://whitehouseaddress.blogspot.co.uk/2016/10/the-issue-with-coaching-in-english_3.html